• Sibbo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    “Full Self Driving (Supervised)” is not actually full self driving. “Supervised” means that the driver is responsible at all times.

    So since there is a driver watching, I’d imagine the bar for getting it licensed would be quite low anyways.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It’s got that “100% Beef™” vibe. Like we’ve decided that the word “full” doesn’t mean anything anymore.

    • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      A people who will accept a bait-and-switch like rebranding something that’s not full self-driving as “Full Self-Driving” can be conditioned to accept other forms of bait-and-switch. Case in point: the recent election

    • pedz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It’s obviously not “full self driving” because I don’t have a driving license and cannot use a Tesla to drive me where I need to go. Same for people that can’t drive, like the blind.

      If they were truly autonomous cars, people wouldn’t need a driving license to use FSD.