• miskOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    They’re definitely pro-Ukraine and pro-Palestine due to basic human decency, just more nuanced and less concerned with appearance because they report from Hispanic / Latino perspective and naturally they’re a bit more detached due to distance.

    • Riddick3001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Tnx. So "less worried about appearance ", is being the main difference you reckon?

      I checked them out, apart of being pro PS some years ago, they came out very trustworthy and factual.

      Yet somehow the paper “reads” completely different to other western media outlets,. It could be what you said.

      • miskOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Being less worried about appearance in regards to war in Ukraine stems from aspiring to be the voice of global south, at least in my perception. They tend to underscore humanitarian cost and threat of escalation because they don’t have as much historical context as Eastern Europe does, but that doesn’t mean they don’t recognise that the blame is solely on Russia. To them invasion of Ukraine is about as distant as civil war in Myanmar is for someone in Ukraine.

        El Pais reminds me of weekly news/political magazines from the time when those were still printed on paper. Their reporting covers majors news, politics but also popular science and culture. What’s nice about them is that they’re don’t publish a story unless it’s reasonably fleshed out. Even though it’s obviously left leaning it doesn’t go overtly partisan like The Guardian.