• reksas
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    It doesnt matter if you cant trust anything you see? What if you couldn’t be sure if you weren’t talking to bot right now?

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Photos/video from unknown sources have already been completely worthless as evidence for a solid decade. If you used a random picture online to prove a point 5 years ago, you were wrong. This does not change that reality in any way.

      The only thing changing is your awareness that they’re not credible.

      • reksas
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        What about reliable sources becoming less reliable? Knowing something is not credible doesn’t help if i can’t know what is credible

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          They are not reliable sources. You cannot become less reliable than “not at all”, and that has been the state of pictures and videos for many years already. There is absolutely no change to the evidentiary value of pictures/video.

          Making the information more readily available does not change the reality that pictures aren’t evidence.

          • reksas
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            I’m not talking about evidence, i’m talking about fundamendal being able to trust anything digital at all in any context. What if you couldnt be sure if phonecall from your friend was actually from your friend or if you cant be sure about any picture shown to you if its actually about some real thing.

            Things you need to be able to trust in daily life dont have to be court-level evidence. That is what abuse of ai will take from us.

            • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              24 days ago

              It’s the exact same thing. You’re drawing a distinction between two identical things.

              Pictures have not been credible for a long time. You shouldn’t have “trusted” a picture for anything 5 years ago.

              The only thing that’s in any way different is that now you know you can’t trust it.

              • reksas
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                24 days ago

                I suppose the conclusion is that we need better ways to verify things

                • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  24 days ago

                  The conclusion is to learn to be comfortable with uncertainty.

                  The world is inherently uncertain, all the way down to the possibility of measuring subatomic particles.