So a few popular Linux distros decided to drop a few major packages like how red hat dropped rpm packages for libreoffice in favor for the flatpak packages.

If more distros decided to drop more packages from their main repository in favor for flatpak packages, then are there any obvious concerns? From my personal experience, flatpaks didn’t work well for me. If flatpaks become mainstream and takeover the linux distros, then I might just move to Freebsd. I just want to know if there is any positives to moving away from official repositories to universal repositories.

  • naeap
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I haven’t really kept up with flatpak, so maybe my view of isn’t right.
    but what is your reasoning behind using flatpak for all your GUI apps instead of your distributions package manager?

    • Nitrousoxide@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      On the fly atomic updates (the recommended update path for DNF installed apps requires a system reboot.) Though you can do it live, doing offline upgrades is safer so you don’t replace some runtime something is using midflight.

      Also, flatpaks have some system isolation and have to use flatpak portals and explicit permissions/mounts giving them less ability to negatively affect my system.

      Also, Flathub just has everything that I need to run anyway, at least for GUI apps.