This was always the plan. They will contest any replacement and then only Trump will be on the ballot. AOC tried to warn you fucking people. This is why Biden needed to go over a year ago and the PARTY said “fuck you guys” until it was too hard to fucking ignore.

  • WatDabney
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I actually hope that you’re right, because that would mean that the cabal that intends to overthrow democracy in the US is much more stupid than I had thought.

    In the first place, the whole idea that a candidate might be prohibited from dropping out and/or that the party would in that event be prohibited from choosing a replacement is farcical on its face. Beyond that, the SC explicitly ruled after the 2016 race that the DNC is essentially entirely free to do whatever the fuck they want. Additionally, they recently ruled regarding Trump’s removal from ballots that states are not free to do whatever the fuck they want.

    What that means is that in order to rule in such a way as to deny a replacement would reveal the complete and utter corruption of the system almost four months before the election, which would be an exceedingly stupid thing to do.

    The far better strategy would be to just bide their time, let the democrats do whatever they choose to do, then implement the coup after the election (and preferably as close to the inauguration as possible) so they can accomplish it all at once, then hide behind the president’s newly granted dictatorial powers.

    • Kraiden@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’re assuming they care about keeping their corruption hidden. They want absolute power! Who cares if the people know the system is corrupt if there’s nothing they can do about it. Most dems are already aware that this is a fight for democracy itself, and the reps will just say they’re “using the corruption to their advantage so they can fix it” or something.

      The strategy you’ve outlined relies too heavily on their winning the election fairly. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not impossible, but it’s far from a sure bet.

      • WatDabney
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Who cares if the people know the system is corrupt if there’s nothing they can do about it.

        Because for the moment, there’s not “nothing they can do about it.”

        Most notably, the dictatorial power they established for Trump’s benefit is not yet in Trump’s hands - it’s in Biden’s. And particularly in light of the fact that he’s withdrawing from the race, he’s entirely free to do whatever he pleases. Like, for instance, haveTrump and every single other person who’s a part of this planned coup executed. Or, for instance, pardon any and all private citizens who might take it upon themselves to do the same.

        The fascists aren’t going to be safe until that power is in their hands. And that won’t be until after the election.

        The strategy you’ve outlined relies too heavily on their winning the election fairly.

        Not at all

        The only difference I see between him winning fairly and him losing is whether the act that will mark the moment at which the autocrats fully and publicly play their hand is the attempt to get him into office in spite of his loss or whatever they put the highest priority on after his win.

        In either event, the time for them to play their hand is later - not now.