• YTG123
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s no way of knowing that, though. Perhaps their Linux and Darwin drivers wouldn’t have paniced the system?

    Regardless, doing almost anything at the kernel level is never a good idea

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also, it’s less about “their” drivers and more about what a kernel module can do.
      Saying “there’s no way to know” doesn’t fit, because we do know that a malformed kernel module can destabilize a linux or mac system.

      “Malformed file” isn’t a programming defect or something you can fix by having a better API.

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Having the data exposed to userspace via an API would avoid having to have a kernel module at all… Which when malformed wouldn’t compromise the kernel.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I mean, sure. But typically operating systems don’t expose that type of information to user space, instead providing a kernel interface with user mode configuration.

          It’s why they use the same basic approach on mac and Linux.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Security operations being one of the things that is often best done at the kernel level because of the need to monitor network and file operations in a way you can’t in user mode.