• sigmaklimgrindset
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        …then the original saying doesn’t apply, does it? Is this some kind of “gotcha” I’m not understanding?

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          …then the original saying doesn’t apply, does it?

          And that’s the million dollar question. I’m not arguing the perfect should be the enemy of the good. I’m questioning how much “good” I get by aligning myself with a fundamentally bad dude. Biden’s played this bait-and-switch game before, and there’s a real reason to believe 2025 Joe Biden won’t be willing or able to deliver on his 5% rent cap promise. In exchange, what is he asking you to give up?

          An hour of your life in line to vote on election day? A small recurring donation to his campaign? A week block-walking your neighborhood to canvas for him? Three months volunteering to work for his reelection campaign?

          Presidential elections aren’t cheap. I have to wonder what would happen if all the money and manpower pouring into Biden’s coffers was simply directed towards Habitat For Humanity instead. Would we get more bang for our bucks?

          • sigmaklimgrindset
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            Dawg, I’m not even the OP. I was just explaining an idiom, and you expect me to answer a humanist philosophical question as if I’m the greatest thinker of our generation 😭

            I can’t help you decide what extent you’re willing to compromise to vote Biden/democrats. I can’t even vote in the US.