• webghost0101
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I never specified correctly read data.

    I don’t care weather they read it by microwave the tape and provide me a transcript of chef and dinner quest first reactions to it. Or if that ends up actually useful. But its interesting to know wether or not specific data is at all requestable.

    When it comes to things that are deemed public, all the information around it should be too, regardless of intend or use.

    In essence, everything is information, it would be a mistake to discriminate on perceived value because we never know what future science can accomplish or what specific aspiration someone may follow.

    Practical Example: While its reasonable that most people assume The text of the Declaration of Independence is what is important. That is not the case if you happen to do a historical study of hemp genetics and want to learn what strain of the plant was used for the declaration.

    An officia office should to my opinion put as much effort into being helpful against requests of both kind.

    • CapeWearingAeroplane
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The way I understand this, the issue is that without reading it they cannot verify that it doesn’t contain sensitive information, so they can’t give it out. That sounds like a reasonable explanation to me.