• WatDabney
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    No surprise there.

    I’ve long thought that it’s a near universal (and potentially entirely so) thing that fundamentally elitist philosophies are, at heart, comforting fantasies - that people don’t promulgate them because they’ve reasoned their way through to the conclusion that they’re apparently valid, but because they so desperately want to believe that they are.

    • dariusj18@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think sometimes it’s the opposite. Sometimes it’s because of one’s own failure to recognize the philosophy in time that one later learned. For example, I have a theory that Atheism weeds one out from power. If you are shrewd enough you recognize that it is better to be a wolf in sheep’s clothing than to resign from the game. I came to this conclusion after weeding myself out.

      • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Forgive me if I misunderstood what you wrote, but pretending to be something you are not in public just to reap the benefits of said social status seems excruciatingly exhausting to me. I think “better” in this context is very subjective to what you value in life.

        • dariusj18@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          More influential. More a part of the larger apparatus. Similar to the idea of social darwinism, I removed myself from the equation so my ideas will not propagate.