• Ranvier
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s less barriers than you may think. For one the nominating convention hasn’t happened yet. The only state that was a potential barrier was Ohio, and they made a change so the final candidate can be submitted after there too. If dems nominate someone else at their convention, that person should be able to be on all the ballots nationwide. The convention is where the candidate is actually picked, not the caucuses or primaries.

    The money currently in the campaign itself could be transitioned into a PAC. And yes while technically PACS aren’t supposed to coordinate with candidates, we all know that line barely even exists anymore. And some big donors are apparently already building up new funds to be given to a new candidate if that occurs.

    I’m not certain a new candidate will guarantee a win, but I don’t think a politician known for making gaffes for decades now is going to suddenly stop in their old age. And every single misstep will create another flurry of speculation about his cognition, and suck all the air out of the room for the rest of the race. I don’t personally care, if Biden is elected and can’t cut it anymore cognitively than Harris takes over and it’s still miles better than Trump.

    But I worry all of this will just drive down engagement and turn out and make things harder and harder until election day. And it’s clearly been demonstrated no matter how horrific trump acts or what terrible policies he promises or how badly his policies will hurt his own supporters, they aren’t budging no matter what. If a majority of democrats and that slim amount of independent and undecided voters want Biden out of the race based on all of this, I think the best chance to make sure they show up for the polls on election day and vote blue is that they’re given what they want.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Right, the PAC thing then gets brought to the SCOTUS, and do we wanna risk that?

      If George Clooney gets a few billionare buddies to chip in 50M a head to put someone to the front it could work financially, but then who are we even getting?

      The situation is dire. I don’t know that there’s a clear solution. All I know is how I’ll vote regardless.

      • Ranvier
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m unclear why you think the PAC thing would go to scotus. That’s a routine thing. Like who would be sueing exactly, for what reason, and with what standing?

        https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/meetthepressblog/s-happens-candidates-leftover-money-rcna57340

        The money could be donated to a PAC or a political party, so it could also all be given to the DNC. It just can’t be used for personal use. It could get a little thorny if someone besides Harris was picked though and Harris didn’t want the money to go to help democrats for some reason, but that seems unlikely.

        And yes I’m voting for whatever Democrat is on the ballet, I just want whatever gives the best chance of keeping Trump out and helping down ballot democrats in congress who will be needed for any chance of enacting any major changes.