• bleistift2
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    It takes some real mental gymnastics to put the blame for a crash on the driver going “too slow” rather than the inattentive speeding driver who crashed into them.

    • Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      No mental gymnastics needed. The laws of physics don’t give a fuck about who obeys the traffic laws and who doesn’t. As long as people keep the same distance between cars we should be safe.

      • bleistift2
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        What are you arguing? It’s not the obligation of the driver ahead to make sure the car behind them keep their distance.

        • Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Sure, but you can do it by matching the speed of the car behind you, therefore making both of you more safe.

        • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Actually, it is a driver’s job to avoid and/or mitigate a wreck by any means necessary. The only mental gymnastics taking place are yours. You’re arguing against the wording of multiple driver’s manuals.

    • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      You think you’re arguing with me, when I’m just quoting Driver’s Ed, and several states’ Driver’s Manuals. Mental Gymnastics? 🤷