Completely agree. Indeed it seems that they still try to bake its main theme in all the new soundtracks. I still listen to it every morning to get my energy charge!
Completely agree. Indeed it seems that they still try to bake its main theme in all the new soundtracks. I still listen to it every morning to get my energy charge!
Realized now that I double-posted this. You beat me… to the Punch!
Really embarrassing also for the journals that published the papers – and which are as guilty. They take ridiculously massive amounts of money to publish articles (publication cost for one article easily surpasses the cost of a high-end business laptop), and they don’t even check them properly?
Absolutely agree. Edited the post with a warning.
Yeah to me too. I’m not clicking on that “Download client” link for sure.
C148 is also visibile now!
I see that too now with c148,but not with c149 or c147 for example. Maybe just some temporary glitch? I’d give it a day and see. Or maybe email the maintainers. Bummers that you can’t skip directly to c149 without c148 first!
I still see them here:
As most who have already commented here, I’m somewhat unimpressed (and would expect more analytical subtlety from a scientist). Wittgenstein already fully dissected the notion of “free will”, showing its semantic variety of meanings and how at some depth it becomes vague and unclear. And Nietzsche discussed why “punishment” is necessary and makes sense even in a completely deterministic world… Sad that such insights are forgotten by many scientists. Often unclear if some scientists want to deepen our understanding of things, or just want sensationalism. Maybe a bit of both…
The summary I just read sounds great, thanks for the tip!
Thank you for the explanation! – it puts that sentence into perspective. I think he put it in a somewhat unfortunate and easily misunderstood way.
“Bayesian analysis”? What the heck has this got to do with Bayesian analysis? Does this guy have an intelligence, artificial or otherwise?
Yeah, happy to see Todo again. He’s fun & funny :)
It’s reached 333 protesters! that’s 1/3 of the way to 1000, it’d be cool if it kept on increasing :)
Thank you for the neat examples! :) I think I get it now.
Thank you! What you wrote confused me at first, I thought that using @something
created a post that was only visible to user something
– like a direct message. Now I’ve re-read the help pages, and I see that there’s a second “” at the bottom of the post field, to make the post only visible to
something
; otherwise (globe icon) is public.
May I ask: in this latter case, what does @something
achieve then? is it a sort of “user mention”, so the user is notified to have been mentioned in a public post? Will other users interested in something
see it then?
[Edit: I realize that my question was phrased in a completely misleading way. Corrected now.]
Cheers!
No matter when, it’s too late :)