The problem is that there is a current developing dogma around AI that, because the last example you gave exists, then it must be opposed in all cases. There is a lack of nuance. That is why there may be some “pro-ai” posts, to point out this nuance. The only reason they exist is due to the bias against it as a whole.
That is a weird way to say that some billionaire stole a mine.
Pro, but in a much more direct fashion that exists currently. I do believe that not participating in elections leads to worse outcomes, and that unless you want to have a bloody revolution , which I and the overwhelming majority of people do not want, then democracy is really the only path forward.
A gold plated statue is really on the nose for this con artist.
U wot m8?
So what you are saying is that for now the goal is whatever the users make it?
As for the tiktok app (which I have little to no interest in myself), there is loops, but it is still early in development last I checked. I personally feel that the better route to go would be integrating “stories” style posts on mastodon or the threadiverse. My friends who cling to using Instagram use stories quite a bit, so that is definitely a format that needs work.
The only drama I am aware of recently was a piefed admin blocking some smaller anarchist instances, but it stirred up a shit storm and they reversed it. Not sure if that is the drama in question.
How is this fucking war still going on?
These mfers horny for this shit should just play satisfactory.
Who could have seen this coming?? Oh wait, anyone with a brain.
What part of what I said implies that I want bots to take the place of humans on social networks? What a very strange conclusion to jump to. I just think that AI has some useful applications.
People have different opinions on AI, not everyone is vehemently opposed, and some view it as useful if used on the appropriate configuration.
deleted by creator
We really need an alternative to Lemmy and piefed for the threadiverse. I say this as a leftist. People are not children who need child locks put on their internet. This is not the type of environment I joined the fediverse to be a part of, that censors links just because the server admin disagrees with the politics.
How is ita false equivalence to say that animal rights matter? Do sentient beings deserve to be eaten by us, simply because we have consciously decided that we want to be at the top of the food chain? Should you continue to have the highest emissions from your diet, simply because you’re “at the top” of some hypothetical food chain you have no part in executing yourself?
I get that some people need to eat animal products for health reasons, but if your entire reason is “I am an apex predator” (which you’re not, btw), then I don’t see why you shouldn’t be called out for that mentality, which is promoting a view of the world that is pretty exploitative of other living beings and environmentally damaging to boot.
deleted by creator
Yes, right after working families goes bankrupt because they can’t afford to go to their job.
There is a difference between bottling up your emotions and realizing mid sentence that you are not making sense or saying anything that anyone cares about and wishing you had not started talking at all.
I was considering a fair phone, but that announcement has me waiting.
I have seen them not posted by bots, as I have posted them on a Lemmy burner account. So this is somewhat personal for me.