![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
Well Im seeing it properly now, crisis averted?
Well Im seeing it properly now, crisis averted?
Ah, thanks for resolving this mystery for me!
Im a big fan of Webber and the team’s activities.
FWIW, I just read this comment by the user, snarfed - in the matrix room, Federated Devs: https://matrix.to/#/#fediverse-devs:matrix.org
in practice I’m not sure how much it adds, since AP server admins still generally store and control users’ private keys, can sign with them, rotate them, etc this is one thing I like about Bluesky. it’s federated, but it has two levels of keys per user. servers have one level of private key, used for normal interactions. users have another layer that’s only used to switch servers, “undo” a malicious server’s recent activities with its user key, etc.
https://atproto.com/guides/overview#account-portability
The topic came up with-regards-to the complexity and poor interoperability of http signatures between fediverse instances.
This was mentioned: https://comam.es/snac/grunfink
It operates off version 2.28 from the minimalist file
c/o @helgek:matrix.org from room https://matrix.to/#/#fediverse-city:matrix.org
It was recommended by the user Silverpill in the matrix room, Fediverse City. https://matrix.to/#/#fediverse-city:matrix.org
I shall ask there!
I must admit, Blue Sky has been in my periphery.
I glanced at the AT protocol but felt it wouldnt match my needs and values. I would expect that there is enough going on to provide enough momentum for that, so at least they can pivot into something else having learnt lessons.
hey, Im trying to get into the habit of writing what Ive just internalised - its a good motivator. :)
These are recommended lists:
https://delightful.club/delightful-fediverse-apps/
https://delightful.club/delightful-fediverse-clients/