• 1 Post
  • 182 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2023

help-circle

  • it’s a very interesting distribution. it feels and probably is slightly faster than arch, with their optimised packages (I had v3), but to be honest you have to rely on their prebuilt binaries and I prefer flatpaks.

    I used it for ~ 3 months, but eventually went back to arch and flatpaks (using flatpaks on cache defeats the purpose of having v3/v4 packages, until someone starts bundling optimised dependencies ).

    I prefer the originals always, but it is a viable alternative if you enjoy a friendly installer (their Anaconda is very nice).



  • I don’t understand why you are being downvoted. that is simply the truth.

    I have been using an iphone 12 pro for the past 3 weeks ,while my pixel 6 is getting its battery replaced and it’s been painful.

    i’m missing a lot of apps, the ones I do find are limited or asking for monthly subscriptions.

    i am unable to play a downloaded mp3 unless i go through hoops&hurdles .

    i am no longer able to watch a youtube video without ads (unless I do 3 steps of passing them to adguard), or using sponsorblock ( i am on ios 18.2, otherwise I would have jail broken it to oblivion).

    android is simpy better in terms of freedom. IF or when it’ll become a locked garden like ios, it’ll truly be a sad day for the mobile world.










  • hornedfiendtoLinux@lemmy.mlSystemd v257 released
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    All the so-called Linux distributions are really distributions of systemd/Linux!

    but are they really? how about distros without systemd what would you call those OpenRC/Linux? systemd is indeed a giant intricate project,which is why some people don’t like it or are against it,but all its components are working alongside the Linux kernel, without which there wouldn’t be a need for systemd. I would say it’s rather Linux with systemd,as systemd is optional.

    edit: useless autocorrect