![](https://awful.systems/pictrs/image/9b40c389-2954-446a-bae5-73ff918ad531.jpeg)
![](https://awful.systems/pictrs/image/8651f454-1f76-42f4-bb27-4c64b332f07a.png)
I don’t have any proof for this statement but I believe the LLM-minders keep track of whatever stupid shit bubbles up on the internets making fun of their babies and hardcode “solutions” to them in a game of whack-a-mole.
I don’t have any proof for this statement but I believe the LLM-minders keep track of whatever stupid shit bubbles up on the internets making fun of their babies and hardcode “solutions” to them in a game of whack-a-mole.
Steve Yegge goes hard into critihype, there’s no need for any junior people anymore, all you need is a senior prompt engineer. No word on what happens when the seniors retire or die off, guess we’ll have AGI by then and it’ll all work out. Also no word on how the legal profession will survive when all the senior prompt engineer’s time is spend rewriting increasingly meaningless LLM responses as the training corpus inevitably degenerates from slurm contamination.
Some idiot in another forum opined that LLMs haven’t solved climate change “yet”. Sure, bud.
I was having a shitty day but laughing at your tantrum brightened it a little. Thanks!
rabbit data breach: all r1 responses ever given can be downloaded
AI continues to be going great…
Forneus
“ This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2013)”
So true, Wikipedia.
Finally. I’m part of the Cool Gang.
I remember having this sort of conversation 20 years ago, and it didn’t convince me then.
Me asserting copyright means I can express myself however I want, and Nazis can get their images from Unsplash or make it themselves. There’s no risk of complicity on my part.
I only saw it because I follow him on Masto.
Fedi is weird.
I happen to copyright my output (obviously not here or in other comments). The question I ask myself is: would I be ok if a Nazi organization used my photos in their propaganda? I’m not ok with that, so I like to retain control over who can use my stuff. If someone acceptable were to ask me, I’d let them use my work without compensation.
I realized Twitter was for weirdo wonks when the local “Idol” reality show just had IG links for the contestants (Sweden). There might be markets where Twitter is locally bigger, but in Sweden it was always a niche thing.
I got boosted by Charlie Stross…
Web 3.5.1 - web for workgroups
Twitter’s main issue is that it’s not really very big. It wasn’t big even pre-Musk. If you have the choice between advertising on a really big social network (Meta (=FB, IG, Whatsapp…)) with a functioning trust & safety team and ad brokers who take you seriously and don’t accuse you of being woke, and one which has way smaller reach, no T&S to speak of, and whose owner can use his outsized influence to call your CEO a pedo whenever the ketamine kicks in, the choice is clear.
One of my fav Marx anecdotes is no matter how tough economically the family had it, they never dispensed with the maid. Tbf maid wages were prolly really low, and the maid probably made Mrs Marx’ life easier, but I also don’t think Marx ever thought of the maid’s work as Labor.
I wish I knew any normal people so I could give input.
Personally my Twitter pre-Elon was pretty curated. I never really “got” a big part of it unless it spilled over in other channels (I never heard of “Black people Twitter” on Twitter, only from Buzzfeed or similar). I also disengaged from US political Twitter hard after the 2016 election. So it’s possible I could still be using it and swearing over bots etc. without being overly affected, but I locked my account as an act of principle shortly after he took over.
It’s pretty amazing that this so-called genius spent $44B on a company without apparently knowing anything about how the market it operates in (advertising) actually works.
Expect a GOP congressional panel assembled: “The FTC is too snide (and woke)”.
Another one
https://mastodon.social/@bruces/112690475011154532
edit seems to be a whole bunch of similar ones.