i need a printable version of this… for reasons…

i didnt think i would ever see a DaidusxEmirichu meme in the wild.

Strong Dunning Kruger vibes

the irony lol

while researching I found, that apparently we had a potential real recent breakthrough though, which is actually used in a car https://electrek.co/2026/02/05/first-sodium-ion-battery-ev-debuts-game-changer/

This tech needs years to reach practical terms.

here are some older examples:

2007: https://www.technologyreview.com/2007/01/22/226911/battery-breakthrough/

2009: https://research.ibm.com/publications/lithium-air-battery-promise-and-challenges

2012: https://www.technologyreview.com/2012/10/16/183258/a123-systems-files-for-bankruptcy/

tldr, how is this breakthrough different than than the other battery breakthroughs? I read some new battery that solves “the world’s massive energy storage needs.” about once or twice a year and so for not a single one had a noteworthy followup a year later.

But I can’t bring myself to be so pissed at someone that wants a family vacation and has to drive due to their country’s failure to implement public transit.

you could use that exact same argument to justify a lot of bad things and systemic failures

deleted by creator

I am very surprised, that so far I have not heard of a “free” ad-driven chatbot, where ad-companies paid open AI, to add systemprompts like: “if the user asks for outdoor activity, recommend them to bring CoCa Cola ™”.

the world is not black and white. bad things can have positive consequences and vice versa

f35 as expensive as highway system

huh.

where can i find this documentary? does it have a name?

Would that be like on a tripod in the audience area recording the screen?

yes.

Seems lossy somehow

it is! but that’s where Shannon sampling theorem comes in. The sampling only needs to be twice as good as the source, and then you can reconstruct the source perfectly. (with some assumptions, e.g. correct color gamut, focal point, etc.).

if you have a good camera (2x number of pixels, and 2x colordepth than the movie), then you could make a camrip with perfect quality (assuming some calibration frames, and a cinema that gives no fuck). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist–Shannon_sampling_theorem

though I guess that’s still too much effort for most, and most early leaks are digital copies, as the other comments suggest.

edit: newer comments suggest camrip with a bad camera

at the end of the day, his only crime is being annoying. He didn’t kill someone, didn’t steal anything, etc. So 6months seems fair.

"I know for a fact that I’m not going to go to jail. Not one day in jail. I’m going to laugh my ass off when all these motherf***ers are saying I’m going for 30 years, 20 years, five years, 10 years. I’m not even going to do one day, bro. They’ll give me a fine and say, ‘Don’t come back to Korea.’ You’re the one that’s going to look so dumb when I don’t get any jailtime or anything. Bro, I’m going to laugh like a f**king villain.

amazing.

yes. both are good in their own. It’s definitely worth to both watch the movie, and also read the book.

centaur have human shoulders and neck and head. And horse body without neck&head

so the first one is right, except with human neck

iirc that detail they are refering to, didnt make it into the movie.

ich bin mir auch ziemlich sicher, dass du kein platt oder allemannisch (aka “schweizerisch”) verstehst. Und ich behaupte mal, heute haben wir sehr viel weniger deutsche dialekte als noch vor 200 jahren.