@rysiek first of all I don’t see any problems in Twitter technically. It worked well for long time and only now with Musk as CEO we see that not only architecture matters but people supporting it also.
Regarding BS: just take a look at how centralized fediverse is in reality. Eugene just happened to be always talking about mastodon instead of fediverse, everyone is trying to register on mastodon.social when they herd of it first time. I mean they whole fediverse for people right now is only what a man with a German company did.
Once again it’s not technicality but also people who support it matters. We can take at-protocol and do many integrations by our own to create own high level crystallization. Or we can give up on current AP and move on to the next one some time. The more ideas you give to the world the more it gives back.
If they are to make their own evil corp then you and I are allowed not to be it’s customers. Decentralization is about community and people
@samuelitooooo @ajsadauskas @fediverse 2. that’s how activity pub works. If you want somehow get posts from another server you have to ask that server to send your server these posts. That technology constrain looks like a follow while inside there’s a special set of things going on to subscribe to it.
This might be done by creating an instance wide account that’ll subscribe on whatever you want to see in your lists and route things on is own. But this instance wide account might be blocked as easily as any other one.