These links are closer to what you probably intended

these are about nursing home policy not the Libertarian ballot issues though

are you sure you’ve got the link you meant to add to this? because that link goes to one on UK politics

gotta get that sweet corn

the prodigal Jim returns!

beautiful fields of corn

New York man

truth is dead

Douchey rant?

new skill learned: “investigative journalism”

That doesn’t really respond to what I said

but it applies to voting, we can argue about the effectiveness of voting as a tactic but people who vote are more politically engaged than the type of person described in the quote

There are many people who vote, and do nothing else, and that is condemnible. But unless you have direct evidence that the quote originates with someone who explicitly denied the effectiveness of voting in totality I see no reason why the quote would not apply to forms of political advocacy you happen consider ineffective

I don’t particularly want to argue about the effectiveness of voting, beyond to say that I strongly disagree with any bright-line distinction between “electoralism” and whatever other strategies you would care to mention, and that EVERY successful movement (leftist or otherwise) that had the option had the ballot as part of their strategy.

W

but it applies to voting, we can argue about the effectiveness of voting as a tactic but people who vote are more politically engaged than the type of person described in the quote

An important aspect of the success of D&D/40k has been fan creations and lore explainers. A challenge for growing a creative commons (alternatives is that there isn’t a unified set of “cannon” stories for independent creators to make “TOP 10 WACKIEST THINGS IN [franchise]” which are the intellectual equivalent to baby food (which I don’t mean as an insult).

then again, d&d and 40k are popular because the companies that own them decided to let smaller creators do the work of reprocessing the decades worth of lore into easily consumable and marketable chunks. Both the small creators and the central company got to symbiotically feed off of the brand value of the other. Then begins the enshitification once the brand reaches the mainstream

The problem for less centrally controlled media isn’t just that there isn’t decades worth interconnected lore within one overarching franchise, it’s that stories that aren’t centrally controlled will mutate and be remixed too much to have the sort of symbiotic brand growth of 40k and d&d

Honestly I think the drama is a fundamental outgrowth of the way we think about a “feed”. The setup was devised to give people more reason to stay online exposed to advertising, in expense of an overall positive experience. But that’s sort speculation and I wouldn’t be able to point to specifics.

I don’t know what you mean here

I could understand an NDA if you’re talking about the particulars of the backend, but the fact that we don’t know what the NDA contains, AND the author of the entire protocol hasn’t been approached doesn’t bode well (https://octodon.social/@cwebber/110567421460454488)

Ya hear that Lloyd Austin? Time for another 20 billion

why do we care?

I think the problem is that there does need to be a certain amount of anti-establishment to even be interested in a place like Lemmy, there don’t tend to be a lot of anti establishment centrists (those who call themselves as such are for the most party just rightwingers).

While I do agree that ideological diversity is good, one does need to be careful when trying to enact it because you might end up with a place like r/polititicalcompassmemes (though that particular cesspit is probably a different thing entirely).

The main issue when it comes to spreading FOSS alternatives to big tech is that how interesting a social media space is is almost directly related to how much activity there is on it, to be frank there really isn’t much going on here. How we get people to show up and adapt it for themselves is that we ourselves be more engaged in it and spread the word elsewhere off-site

I do, I’m involved in my (rural) state’s democratic party and it’s progressive (read socialist) caucus. And I intend to be involved in local government to advocate for things like worker co-ops and credit unions.

The electoral process is not just voting, voting is the BARE minimum. The point of politics is to get people who agree with you to participate and the people to participate to agree with you, the bare minimum is the start.