There’s no way that doesn’t get struck down though, right?

The small school I taught at said the pledge every day, but the principal did regularly announce to everyone present that they don’t have to say it (but they did have to be there for it)

There’s just a lot of anti trans stereotypes in media that I tolerated before. It’s a lot harder to turn a blind eye to it when people use the same misunderstandings to try and tell me I’m sick and confused and bad for just being myself these days

There are so many examples of anti trans sentiment in older comedy. Just about all of them hinging on the “you can always tell” myth and/or highlighting how obviously wrong and confused the poor trans people must be. For someone whose only exposure to trans people was that for a long time, I can’t begin to say how damaging and limiting that was.

Can I get a teal deer for that tldr?

That was actually the argument made by the official in question. Called it a “consulting fee”.

On top of that, shop for best price? During the one month of open enrollment where it’s allowed? What if the providers all leave the network halfway through the year, as regularly happens? They have literally made it impossible to shop around for the best price.

It is so fucking bullshit in every way. I cannot comprehend why someone would have a problem with single-payer, which is so much better by comparison than what we have to do now.

The only thing I can think is “but I might wind up with slightly less coverage than my work currently provides,” which is also practically impossible for all but the very upper crust…

I dunno, if I have to process my own e pills, I’m gonna mess something up. Maybe if it comes with a cute live-in pharmacist or something

I second this question. How am I even supposed to clean it?

C’est raisonnable, si quelqu’un n’est pas exposé aux gens “x”…

Brake dust is pretty well-mitigated by EVs too, on account of regenerative breaking.

I assumed €$ eddies

I think a large and important difference is the ease of back-room manufacturer. Anyone with a boiler can can make some alcohol, but vapes are rather more complicated, no? Cigarettes and other straight up smoking products would still be around, though.

Alors pourquoi diriez-vous quelqu’un est x-phobe?

Well, no. Perhaps I’ve been misunderstood.

If no evidence whatsoever for a claim exists, then there is no reason to favor that claim. This is an effectively rare situation, and basically only applies to things someone has made up whole cloth just now.

Likewise, the existence of some evidence is not necessarily definitive “proof” of a claim, merely enough of a reason to consider it further (such as considering alternative explanations or how well said evidence matches what we might expect)

In this case, there is evidence that somebody named Jesus may have existed, and however ideal that evidence may or may not be, it is about the amount of evidence we would expect to find of any given figure from his time.

I will say that while evidence existing isn’t definitive proof, the total lack of evidence would be convincing (in the other direction). That said, evidence does exist in this case, so

Edit: clarity

Or, just, like,

“Pretty warm but I’m not complaining, you?”

You’re the one that brought units into it in your example. Maybe you’re the bad friend?

What, are you implying they somehow planned to all show up armed and uniformed? Ridiculous, the odds of such a thing.

I mean if you need to be using precise temperature units just to have a conversation… Maybe find less particular friends?