There’s a term for repeating merely what someone says: hearsay. In no way should that be considered news or journalism.
Good journalism would be not quoting and repeating unsubstantiated claims at all.
Unless you’re going to write an article saying “spokesman makes wild and unsubstantiated claims at press conference”.
True, they’re not targeting civilians. They’re just killing everyone indiscriminately. Hell, they’ve even killed Israelis.
Maybe, but that’s not how the article is framed.
Personally, I don’t think someone spouting off should be repeated. Good journalism would be investigating and verifying the claim.
Objection, speculation.
FirstEnergy? They’re named seven separate times in the article.
Right, but if you bring it up in a discussion forum, expect people to discuss it.
Thanks Mr. Betteridge
Management jobs are rarely union, since they’re the ones making the rules.
Just give them access to it now? There shouldn’t be any issue with it continuing to be available or a while if you should get hit by a bus.
primebuy looks like a ripoff of amazon, insight looks legit, but you’ll probably get what your order from either site
Removed by mod
It’s effectively a sentient weapon that will attack people.
Well, yes, that’s the point. But not specifically people, but any animal coming into the territory, like wolves, coyotes, or foxes, that might kill livestock.
Those breath weapons gotta come from somewhere.
You should consider opnsense instead of pfsense in any case.
Yeah, loss leader probably isn’t the right term for those.
Isn’t that basically what Trump has been doing since day one?
Yes, it’s surprising when a loss leader leads to losses. For example, Olive Garden and their soup, salad, and bread sticks are probably loss leaders because of how cheap they are, but they make up that little loss with much better margins on entrees (and, I assume, drinks).
You’re right, it’s a real estate trust.