Just drawing the situation out, even roughly, is already an enormous step forwards from theatre of the mind, and is doing most of the heavy lifting here. It’s also not “theatre of the mind,” like the original poster is implying. It’s a map, just one without grid-spaces or precise distances.
I like that this can be interpreted as implying that Heracles is a Disney villain.
This works for situations where exact positioning isn’t too important. When want to have AoE spells, move speed, flanking, and battlefield control, it generally because difficult to ensure that the GM and the players have the same picture of the battlefield. Even just drawing it out roughly can help a lot, but pure theatre of the mind really works best when you only care about distance rather than relative positioning and complex battlefield conditions.
Who the fuck uses a random glory hole in a dungeon?
That’s 0 milligrams. 0 magnesium would be “0 Mg” (pay attention to capitalisation). Or even “0mg Mg”.
Believe it or not, jail.
I started my longest-running campaign with a “one-shot”. Part of that was by the publishers’ design. I ran the free module “We Be Goblins” (highly recommended), which involved a pack of goblins searching for more fireworks. The end of that adventure acts as a teaser for the “Jade Regent” adventure path, which I ran to completion with most of the initial group.
In that adventure path, the PCs get to revisit (and drive off) their tribe from the one-shot in the opening act.
There’s never a legitimate reason for a statue to be inside a structure (as opposed to in a public square), unless you’re in a temple or shrine to a friendly god and it’s their statue.
Nothing in the title, but the picture itself is clear. The older lady is visibly talking to the younger man, who himself bears a pose of discomfort inconsistent with the idea that he’s speaking the caption.
That’s only if you put a bag of holding into a portable hole (or is it the other way around?). Bags of holding can go inside each other just fine normally.
If we want to take this seriously, just for fun, then we need to first consider what “put the last bag inside the first” means. Bags of holding are openings into extradimensional spaces, effectively portals. Theoretically, I don’t think there’s any problem with extradimensional spaces containing portals to each other in a looped manner. The problem comes with the physical act of placing one bag inside the last. In order to do so, you’d need to have a way to teleport into a known extradimensional space without using the opening. I don’t think there’s a way to do that in any edition of DnD or Pathfinder, but I could be wrong. If you can, however, then you could use exactly the same technique to retrieve any of the bags and therefore open the loop again.
But lizard :(
I’m sure there’s plenty of people in this community who know how to make people notice their assholes.
Thanks for replying!
This one isn’t up on Socks and Puppets yet? Or is this an older one I’ve forgotten.
One of my Pathfinder characters, Bentithan Flinteye. He’s an evil, but pragmatic, Aasimar psychic warrior, who considers his actions to be for the “greater good”. He’ll use this to justify a lot of things to himself and others, but make no mistake he’s evil and ultimately just wants more power for himself; after all, wouldn’t he be able to do more good with that power? There would be plenty of people who’d think he’s right.
In Pathfinder, Air Bubble and Life Bubble would be the best choices.
Some people really would say “nah, I’d live/I know how to do it safely, but I can’t afford the fine.”