And you are too credulous. They pulled the more sophisticated, legalese-translated version of DavidDoesLemmy’s comment (see bottom of the thread). Just because they’re smart enough to not get banned doesn’t mean they’re acting in good faith.

Pathetic trolling.

Yeah it is rather funny the more I read it. Like, just copy the article language or paraphrase it quickly. Reminds me of reading state ballot measures in the us.

Not just .world. I saw people from all over recommending matrix by element, and element works with the police and nato

I’m not even a tech knower and found that connection

the vast majority dgaf at worst or pretend it’s not happening at best

The fellows at the top are likely rapists
But you like, “Mellow out, man, just relax, it’s really not that complicated”
Well, pardon me, I guess I’m just insane as you explained
Or maybe sanctifying the sadistic is deranged

(explained and deranged pronounced as three syllables)

I know run the jewels are all libbed up and shit, but I love el-p’s production and some of his lyrics (not cool with ableist slurs in particular)

I had a lib friend (I’m very cautious with how much I engage with their views) tell me that they had been going down the rabbit hole of epstein stuff and were starting to think epstein was actually the shadow leader of the cia.

I was nice about disagreeing, but holy shit I had a hard time not being insulting. Ik that’s bad and hope to get to a place where it’s easier to be nice.

I wish you could somehow send this to every single reddit account as a private message replacing the word this with the word everything. I don’t use reddit anymore, but they need to hear it.

Stop. You are not entitled to tedious explanations of everything. You are abusing the good will of the members of this community. Many users have been exhaustingly comprehensive in answering your questions, but you insist on being dismissive, obtuse, and lazy. It is clear that you’re trolling. I hate to consider the alternative and how it reflects on your behavior, so I’ll give you the benefit the doubt.

Edit: whoops, I forgot I was reading a month-old thread. So, I added a strikethrough to the word “stop” since this conversation was over until I showed up.

I see that you think you’re Morgan freeman in se7en, but you are NOT Morgan freeman in se7en, and ghost_laptop ain’t Brad Pitt in se7en. I hope you had fun with your little trolling spree in this thread.

The comment you replied to is just “not all men!,” but group-flavored. You’re right to call it whataboutism.

Class analysis and racism are the same, folks. I too am shocked, but you can’t lie on the Internet, so here we are.

It says:

She was the first South Korean director who was allowed to visit North Korea after Korean War without being charged for treason by South Korea, because she has a German passport. She gave up South Korean citizenship and took the German one just for making this documentary and getting a visa and the permission of shooting from North Korea

The phrasing is a bit odd, but the reference goes to a DW article, the subheading of which is:

A new film made by Sung-Hyung Cho attempts to give outsiders an insight into life in North Korea. The director, who even had to give up her South Korean nationality to shoot the film, spoke to DW about the project.

So you and I watch memento like, how is this interesting? Doesn’t everyone live like this?

Yeah, you’re right. You and other user must agree on terms and on what you already agree on first.

I saw they had a similar experience of talking past each other with cowbee. They might be a particularly articulate wrecker, but I didn’t want to jump straight there.

Sometimes people sacrifice things for principles. What’s funny about that?

Shoehorning objectivation into every context may be simple, but answering the question of why we do that is not.

“He takes the some of the liberal achievements (rationalism, the end of feudal bondage, and the Labor Theory of Value) and shows that they can only be fully realized by moving beyond the capitalist mode of production”

I thought that was pretty clear. The achievements are to be fully realized which cannot be done without overthrowing liberal democracy. The full realizations of achievements are mutually exclusive with the continued existence of libdem

That might not be what they meant though. That’s just how I read it.

Not even the very wise can see all ends

Do you not have people in your life who understand that the police lock people up for bullshit all the time? Why would they assume you deserved it? You need less ignorant people in your life (don’t we all)

Yes, and some use the terms pejoratively while knowing exactly what they mean. Tactical ignorance