The Alabama Supreme Court ruled Friday that frozen embryos are children, which pro-choice rights groups have warned could have dangerous implications for fertility treatments such as in vitro fertilization.

The Alabama Supreme Court on Friday reversed Mobile County Circuit Court Judge Jill Parrish Phillips’ decision to dismiss a lawsuit in which a couple sued an Alabama fertility clinic and hospital for the “wrongful death” of their frozen embryos in a ruling that was riddled with theology. The couple’s frozen embryos were destroyed after a hospital patient who accessed the freezer that held the embryos dropped them on the floor. The ruling means that the couple can sue for wrongful death.

This should end well. /s

  • LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    9 months ago

    In other news, hundreds of Alabama hospital staff were arrested for keeping children locked in freezing rooms for weeks on end.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      You jest but pro birthers don’t want embryos to be sitting in a freezer waiting to be used. They want them in a women’s body and to be fertilized asap. If the women doesn’t want more kids? Too bad.

    • ferralcat@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Heh wait till they learn there’s a non zero percent of embryos that get fertilized but never implant in the womb and get flushed down the toilet every month.

  • DevCat@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    9 months ago

    How many embryos do you think you can manage to store? According to one site, storage costs are $400-$600 per year. You should be able to claim one exemption for each embryo and wipe out your withholding taxes. Maybe even get some extra state benefits, like qualifying for state aid since your income is so low on a per-child basis.

    • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      As many as you are willing to go through the process with. Not sure when you would break even or see a “profit” based on cost though. Each cycle costs ~$4k+ with insurance and ~$10k+ without. And it is my understanding the process isn’t “fun” or “easy”.

      Also, would the “children” ever age out? And when would you start counting for their age if they did/could age out? And if they do age would you get in trouble for not enrolling them in school? Or even if you do would you get in trouble for them never actually attending?

      I have so many questions!

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        9 months ago

        They’re children, but have no birthday, so they never age!

        An exemption of $4,400 per child plus potentially another $1,900 in child tax credit makes it pay off within the first year. And why not just huck 'em in your own freezer and save on those storage costs to boot?

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          9 months ago

          Because you don’t want the children to die in YOUR care. That was an easy question.

            • hddsx@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              I feel like a state that tries to regulate embryos are going to heavily control the action of “scooping a few more out”

        • LrdThndr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          9 months ago

          This is starting to read like a magic the gathering combo.

          —-

          Alabama - Legendary Land

          At the beginning of your upkeep, create a 0/1 white child creature token and tap it.

          Child creature tokens do not untap during your untap phase.

          1, tap, sacrifice an untapped child creature token: Exile target creature or planeswalker until Alabama leaves the battlefield.

      • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah they don’t talk about this much but a lot of women that donate eggs actually end up infertile, with breast or colon cancer, and/or a host of other severe and painful complications. Egg retrieval is not an easy or risk-free procedure, especially if you have the fertility to conceive on your own. And because of the lack of long-term data, they don’t have to inform you about this stuff before you go through with it.

    • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      Won’t work. Guarantee the courts will rule that embryos are only children in cases where medical personnel can be prosecuted. Aka only when they want.

      Turns out logic doesn’t apply in cases where the ruling isn’t based on logic.

  • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    9 months ago

    The storage facilities can then claim child tax credits for each embryo, right? Are the embryos currently considered in-prisoned against their will? Welfare and food stamp application for the embryos should be interesting. Can I install a freezer with hundreds of frozen embryos, then use taxpayer money to help pay for my mansion to “shelter” them in? Where is the line drawn? Are menstrual cycles without pregnancy considered murder each month? WTF

  • hydroptic
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Being as I am from the Nordics where religion is generally not too visible in public life, seeing language that is this explicitly religious in legal text is just mind-boggling:

    the Alabama Constitution Section 36.06, which argues that each person was made in God’s image, meaning each life has an incalculable value that “cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God.”

    Also, here’s a completely random legal factlet for you: the Criminal Code of Finland was originally written into law in 1889 and it still has an “intro” from tsar Alexander III of Russia. It translates to approximately this:

    We Alexander the Third, by the Grace of God, Emperor and Sovereign of the whole Russian Empire, Tsar of Poland, Grand Duke of Finland, etc., etc., etc., etc., do hereby make known: by the subordinate proposal of the State Legislatures of Finland, We hereby graciously establish the following criminal code for the Grand Duchy of Finland, the enforcement of which, as well as the execution of penalties, shall be the subject of a special decree

    That’s the only part left of the original law, the rest has been amended a zillion times and I think the oldest sections in the current text are from the 70’s. Why that bit from the tsar is still there is honestly a good question, considering our time under Russian rule isn’t exactly fondly remembered (although wasn’t nearly as bad as what they got in the Baltics for example).

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Every sperm is sacred.

    Every sperm is great.

    If a sperm is wasted,

    God (and Alabama) gets quite irate.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 months ago

    Do these hospitals and labs have to apply for a daycare license?

    And are lab technicians, nurses, doctors, and scientists now forced to endure babysitter minimum wages as a result of this ruling?

    Obvious sarcasm. Alabama is such an embarrassment to the free world.

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 months ago

    Nobody actually believes this bullshit. Anyone who was forced to choose between saving a toddler and a canister containing 1000 human embryos, would choose the toddler.

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s how you know their argument is false. Literally no one would waver between saving an actual baby and an embryo. Even if it was a billion embryos (not sure how that would happen), the baby would be saved first. Even if it was your embryo, you would save a random baby first (unless you’re a sociopath).

      People are just hardwired to care about babies, not cells. That’s why the “pro-life” pamphlets and signs have actual babies on them. People care about born children more.

      • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Even if it was your embryo, you would save a random baby first (unless you’re a sociopath).

        What if that baby was Hitler? Checkmate, atheists!

    • gullible@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Alabama is looking to police and control people, the text they’re deriving the idea from is irrelevant aside from being invocable and authoritative. Read The Handmaid’s Tale to see a glorious breakdown of the methodology.

    • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ovulation too. Every woman must remain pregnant at all times or else she is willingly participating in the death of babies.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I guess this is what they mean, when they say reality beats fiction.
    This level of insanity is astounding.
    They say USA is as religious as Iran. I guess they could be right.
    Claiming late bronze age ignorant superstitious writings as the basis for decisions on laws today is insane by any standard, except the standard of religious insanity.

  • sickday@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Cool so we can claim these frozen embryos on our taxes right? We can get state benefits that are allotted to children for these embryos as well?