(gift link, not mine)

  • Uranium3006@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    At that point you may as well just have an apartment complex with a park. Single family homes for the sake of it at the very edge of praticality. This is the last dieing breath of a failing model of housing

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      R O W H O U S I N G.

      Gardening, owning a workshop, are two hobbies which are pretty much impossible in apartment complexes (as are many other things which are deal-breakers to anyone with enough income to have an opinion on the matter). However to think it’s either “apartment complex” or “detached house with five parking spots and a grass monoculture” is a false dichotomy. A terraced house with 3 stories and a basement used to be the standard for the working class where I live, and it is a huge shame they went out of fashion.

      Row housing sits halfway between apartment buildings and detached houses, density-wise. Maybe much closer to apartments if you’re comparing against low-rises with ample green space.

      This is obviously the niche that the trend in the article tries to fill, while failing hard due to zoning laws forbidding terraced housing despite the fact that the exact same lots would immediately double the livable space at almost zero cost (besides a few grand in fireproof and soundproof materials I guess).