🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 9 months agoAnon reconnects with naturesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1883arrow-down120
arrow-up1863arrow-down1imageAnon reconnects with naturesh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 9 months agomessage-square87fedilink
minus-squareMango@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·9 months agoIt’s literally discrimination yo. The should never be more/less rights for specific groups like race, gender, age, etc…
minus-squareLmaydev@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·9 months agoNo it’s literally not and there absolutely should be when you take cultural biases into account. If everyone was equal to begin with you’d be right but they aren’t. Putting a female or foreign sounding name on a CV results in less responses. So those people should be given a boost because they’re already behind. Disabled people are already at a disadvantage so giving them an advantage doesn’t make anyone else worse off. It’s not a zero sum game.
It’s literally discrimination yo. The should never be more/less rights for specific groups like race, gender, age, etc…
No it’s literally not and there absolutely should be when you take cultural biases into account.
If everyone was equal to begin with you’d be right but they aren’t.
Putting a female or foreign sounding name on a CV results in less responses. So those people should be given a boost because they’re already behind.
Disabled people are already at a disadvantage so giving them an advantage doesn’t make anyone else worse off.
It’s not a zero sum game.