The logic of these people is flawless, I don’t understand why the judge can’t see that and needs evidence. _/s

They:

• we would and some even have done shady stuff at the election
• this means the other side has done it obviously too
• someone has told someone else they are absolutely sure ballot stuffing happened, but we can’t remember who said it and who it was can’t remember they said it, but it definitely without a doubt was said and since we know we would have done it they have done it
• don’t you see how it creates a perfect circle(jerk) - case closed