• yggstyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sure there may be a hard copy but that will only have value after the crime is committed. Deauth / jamming will prevent the more meaningful things like proximity alerts and notifications from informing the user (or security system) which could lead to intervention.

      I’ve always viewed camera storage as a fallback in the event something fails. Don’t get me wrong I think redundancy is great and it’s a fine feature. It has value - just less so in this particular case.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        You could set up an alert for “hey, all my security cameras just misteriously disconnected”…

        Not advocating for wireless security solutions, just saying it’s not so hopeless.

        • yggstyle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          That would definitely be a good approach if you were stuck with the wireless option. Im sure some software may address those disconnections in just the way you describe.

          My responses have been looking at the technology broadly - in the way I might if someone asked me for my opinion prior to investing in gear. People frequently overestimate the effort required to achieve a bypass of a security device. So my goal was to provide some core knowledge.

          I do like the suggestion though- it may help somone improve their own existing setup 👍