(Please keep in mind this is something I’ve written in regards to all of these various social platforms, not just kbin, mastodon, lemmy, etc)

Albeit, other platforms have failed their user base for various reasons. This article isn’t about that. This is about addressing other issues that encourage low effort or otherwise useless content. The vast landscape of social media platforms, there is a growing need to reevaluate and refine the user experience (UX) to address common issues that hinder genuine interaction and content discovery. By examining the shortcomings of existing practices and proposing innovative changes, we can create a more engaging and meaningful online environment.

Hiding Voting Metrics:
Voting metrics inadvertently lead to conformity and discourage users from expressing genuine opinions. Users should feel more comfortable sharing their thoughts and perspectives without fear of judgment or backlash.

Removing Emoji-Based Reactions:
The current practice of using emoji reactions as a means of interaction lacks depth and context. These reactions do not provide any insight into why a user liked, disliked, or loved a post… This change would promote more genuine interaction and create a space for nuanced conversations.

Discouraging Clout Chasing Behaviors:
Platforms can implement measures that limit the emphasis on popularity metrics. Introduce alternative ways to measure influence and impact (insightful comments, fostering discussions, valuable contributions). By shifting the focus from superficial metrics to meaningful engagement, platforms can create an environment that encourages authentic participation.

Promoting Content Quality and Relevance:
Hiding voting metrics and mitigating clout chasing behaviors allows platforms to prioritize quality and relevance. Engagement, interactions, relevance, and authenticity is used to determine the visibility of content. This approach ensures that valuable and meaningful content receives recognition, while reducing the emphasis on arbitrary popularity metrics.

Recognizing the Limitations of Memes:
While memes can be entertaining and lighthearted, they often lack the depth. Memes, while humorous, rarely foster in-depth discussions or promote the exchange of diverse perspectives. By highlighting the limitations of relying on meme-based content, platforms can encourage users to move beyond superficial engagement and embrace more substantive interactions.

This approach optimizes content organization by utilizing horizontal space before continuing vertically. This method ensures that users can browse through a larger number of posts allowing users to quickly scan and explore popular posts while maintaining a clear overview of the content available. Reorganizing the UX of platforms by adopting a mass display approach for content organization brings numerous benefits. It optimizes content visibility, promotes content diversity, and streamlines content organization. By presenting the most interacted-with content side-by-side (instead of most popular on top) and utilizing horizontal space effectively, platforms create a dynamic and engaging user experience.

This reimagined platform design enhances content discoverability, improves user engagement, and fosters a thriving online community that values quality and relevance.

There are tons of other aspects of this to discuss but I won’t bother diving into them (how new and unpopular posts receive recognition, front page content dying off due to less interaction based on time decay, etc etc)

  • NotTheOnlyGamer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m absolutely of the mindset that all non-comment interactions should be totally anonymous. I’m disincentivized to react to content, positively or (especially) negatively, because I expect that the Reddit-style behavior of trawling a user’s history if you disagree with them is commonplace. We need full anonymity - not just pseudonymity.

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No thanks. That sounds like a way of getting jumped on by nameless anti queer trolls who hate on queer folk for daring to exist.

      • NotTheOnlyGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re that afraid that people like that are just hiding in the woodwork and will jump on anything they find, why engage at all?

        • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because they’re not the only people out there, and what I need is an easier way to tell the two groups apart

          • Unhappily_Coerced@kbin.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            We all have the power to curate our own online spaces by using common features like blocking and reporting. Moderation on smaller platforms would certainly be rough though, depending on the amount of users or abusers said platforms happens to attract.

            what I need is an easier way to tell the two groups apart

            People tend to surround themselves with others who are like minded… Shielding themselves from opposition… This creation of echo chambers has very negative effects… Confirmation bias, limiting your understanding, stagnation of your ideas, and an increasing polarization surround the issues at hand. Seeking validation and interaction from people who disagree with our views promotes intellectual growth, critical thinking, and empathy.

            It doesn’t matter how good or bad someone’s ideas are if you only have people telling you your ideas are great…

            It is crucial to recognize that merely receiving praise and agreement from others, regardless of the quality of our ideas, does not lead to genuine progress or personal development. Acceptance of our views by others should not be expected if we are unwilling to embrace alternative viewpoints ourselves. As we as a society empathize more with marginalized communities, it becomes even more vital to create spaces that encourage open dialogue, understanding, and respect for diverse opinions.

            Indeed, free speech has it’s limitations. But, I implore you to engage with these people you try to shield yourself from… Destroy their arguments with logic. Downvoting them or having them banned does nothing to encourage intellectual growth from either side of the argument.

            More often then not, there’s nothing stopping them from coming back with a new account…

            • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It doesn’t work that way.

              The people that you want me to engage with believe I should be robbed of my rights, denied medical care, and sometimes encourage me to kill myself.

              I am an advocate, visible and vocal in my day to day life. But I need some spaces that aren’t that, where I don’t have to have my shields up and be in super defence mode just to share some memes and talk about board games.

              I’ve been involved with community development for close to 30 years. I know how it works. I’ve seen it all.

              Your comment, whilst well intentioned, misses the reality of the cost of openly being a member of a minority that is actively targeted by bigots with hate in their hearts.

        • AnonTwo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wait aren’t you one post ago saying you want to hide post history because people using your post history against you made you afraid to comment?

          Like I’m not even going through a post history, it’s your response right above hers. I’d even argue that the kindof people she’s worried about are much, much, much more common than people who go into other’s user histories.

          I think maybe 10 times in 10 years did I ever have anyone actually try to attack my argument using my post history…

          • NotTheOnlyGamer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s from comments. Comments, by nature, have to be pseudonymous unless we go full-on 4chan with anonymity. If I’m commenting or posting something, that’s fine - I’m arguing that the upvotes should be anonymous, as they are on Reddit. I don’t want someone else being able to see my voting history - or anyone else’s, because agreement or disagreement with a post or a comment isn’t something that I feel should be public.

            • Unhappily_Coerced@kbin.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I agree with everything you’ve said in this thread. I submit that, not only should the voting system be anonymous, the results should be hidden from everyone, besides the user who is viewing their own account information or usage history.

              By keeping the voting system anonymous, we avoid the possibility of blind conformity to the masses and facilitate a more free and safe community. With the aim of encouraging critical thinking and discouraging jumping to conclusions.