CreamyWeenie@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agoRule of holdinglemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up180arrow-down10
arrow-up180arrow-down1imageRule of holdinglemmy.blahaj.zoneCreamyWeenie@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareLolaCat@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoHow about a bag of holding with many kobolds?
minus-squareCreamyWeenie@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoTruly the best of both worlds.
minus-squaredejf@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoPerhaps a bag of holding with many kobolds with many pockets? Which contain more bags with more kobolds with more pockets—
minus-squareDarkenLM@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoThat has enough “Shulker Box inside Shulker Box” energy to make the universe implode.
minus-squareYakTrimmer@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoLabelled as “Oops! All Tucker’s kobolds!”
How about a bag of holding with many kobolds?
Truly the best of both worlds.
Perhaps a bag of holding with many kobolds with many pockets? Which contain more bags with more kobolds with more pockets—
That has enough “Shulker Box inside Shulker Box” energy to make the universe implode.
Labelled as “Oops! All Tucker’s kobolds!”