• AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
    182·
    10 months ago

    So you’re saying, that UIs are only good, if the user of the software pays for it directly, because offering a UI for free (like Instagram) disincentivices making it good, despite the fact that said UI requires a good UX to be even economically viable?

    Have you used Microsoft Word, Windows or SAP lately?

    Your entire argument sounds more like you really want to believe Atlas Shrugged was a documentary, and not like an analysis.

    • Kuinox@lemmy.world
      79·
      10 months ago

      Do you twist my word on purpose maybe ?
      I wrote:

      Most OSS software have UX thats sucks

      my point was that software developed without money incentive in mind are not nicer either

      And now you say: “So you’re saying, that UIs are only good, if the user of the software pays for it directly”.

      Can you make a reply without twisting my words in the process ?

      Have you used Microsoft Word, Windows or SAP lately?

      Yes for the first two.

      Your entire argument sounds more like you really want to believe Atlas Shrugged was a documentary, and not like an analysis.

      I’m not American, I don’t get your references.

      PS: On lemmy, “Show context”, is a button, not a link, you can’t open it in a new tab, you cannot keep the context of what you are writing.
      Voting a comment while replying delete what you are writing.