Bluetreefrog@lemmy.worldM to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoAskLemmy temporarily closedmessage-squaremessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1236arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1234arrow-down1message-squareAskLemmy temporarily closedBluetreefrog@lemmy.worldM to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square89fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 months agoJust the IP bans don’t sound good. CG-NAT, VPNs, public networks, school networks, etc… makes a lot of people share the same IP.
minus-squareLvxferre@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 months agoI’m aware that IP bans inconvenience users who did nothing wrong. But I feel like this can be alleviated: make the IP ban temporary. The idea is to force the spammer to get another IP or give up, not to use the IP itself as the enforcement. IP-ban only account creation, not activity. So even if you’re using the same IP, as long as you already have an account, you should be unaffected. But… well, we’re back into “lemmy needs better built-in mod tools” territory.
Just the IP bans don’t sound good. CG-NAT, VPNs, public networks, school networks, etc… makes a lot of people share the same IP.
I’m aware that IP bans inconvenience users who did nothing wrong. But I feel like this can be alleviated:
But… well, we’re back into “lemmy needs better built-in mod tools” territory.