I’m not a true mechanical keyboard enthusiast. I mean I like a good keyboard for typing code, so I rolled with model-Ms in the 80s and 90s, then some expensive Cherry keyboard I only recently retired because it was utterly spent (and it was PS/2), and now I happily use a Wooting Two HE.

I’m so glad the mechanical gaming keyboard scene has developed so much: it means there’s a plethora of really excellent keyboards for the rest of us who don’t play games.

But something utterly baffles me: why are high-quality keyboards getting smaller?

There’s a lot more keyboards without the numpad and the block of middle keys - whatever they’re called - or with the middle keys reduced or squashed up awkwardly on the side, than full-size plain old 102- or 104-key layout keyboards. What’s wrong with the numpad? Isn’t more keys generally better?

Back in the days, I bought the original Happy Hacking keyboard because it kind of made sense to maneuver around in our server room with a small keyboard that took up less space. Typing on it drove me up the wall but it was convenient to carry. And I guess it was also good option for going to LAN parties with a smaller backpack. But other than that, for a keyboard that never leaves your desk, I don’t get it.

Are there other advantages to smaller keyboards? Genuine question! I’m not dumping on smaller keyboards: to each his own and if you’re happy with yours, more power to you. I’d just like to know why you prefer smaller.

  • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hoo boy. This is an issue close to my heart about which I could talk for an unreasonable length of time.

    I’m an accountant. Yes, spreadsheets. I always thought I you’d have to pry my numpad from my cold dead hands.

    About 6 months ago I bought one of the saucy little mech boards of which you speak. A keychron k6. It was a whimsical purchase. It would make my thinkpad set up look better when I posted pictures to /r/thinkpad.

    Turns out, I love using it so much that I can do without a numpad.

    The core element to answer your “why not full size” question is simply that this little harlot fits in my backpack, where a 100% board would not.

    Anyhow, I have a d-pad, and 2x function keys that can modify any key to whatever you want. So I don’t miss having any of the extra special keys. It took surprisingly little time to get used to.

    On occasion, I do have to grind through entering a list of numbers, but it’s really not that often and doesn’t take that much extra time.

    • axo10tl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I do have to grind through entering a list of numbers

      Have you considered a numpad layer? They’re great. All of the speed and convenience with none of the wasted space or extra arm movements.

      I have a numpad for both hands on my Redox :-)

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      accountant no 10-key happy

      Why must you fill my thread with lies?

      (LOL, your post is truly unexpected.)

      • Kiloee@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Accountant here too (well assistant tax adviser doing mainly accounting) and I have the numpad on a layer on the right hand and often used shortcuts on the left hand. It is really nice and only took me like a week to get comfy with.

        The extra shortcuts also help a lot, because they are hardcoded into the software and some of them are pretty dumb (shift+F8 and ctrl+numpad / f.e.).

        One thing I haven’t seen in this thread yet is how lower number keys allow for an even split and this ergo boards that allow for better posture, especially for the shoulders.