• Kittenstix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s definitely not going to slash it 90% to do that you’d have to make moves to guarantee houses are always losing value, much in the same way cars do, so that you have a thriving used house market for people that can’t afford, or don’t care, to buy new.

    That means either implementing the construction of houses with materials that have a short life, or forcing houses to be torn down after, let’s say 50 years.

    I’d prefer just getting rid of ownership of property, but i dont know if we are ready for that as a society.