Akio Toyoda, Toyota Motor’s chairman, has never been a huge fan of battery electric vehicles. Last October, as global sales of EVs started to slow down amid macroeconomic uncertainty, Toyoda crowed that people are “finally seeing reality” on EVs. Now, the auto executive is doubling down on his bearish forecast, boldly predicting that just three in 10 cars on the road will be powered by a battery.

“The enemy is CO2,” Toyoda said, proposing a “multi-pathway approach” that doesn’t rely on any one type of vehicle. “Customers, not regulations or politics” should make the decision on what path to rely on, he said.

The auto executive estimated that around a billion people still live in areas without electricity, which limits the appeal of a battery electric vehicle. Toyoda estimated that fully electric cars will only capture 30% of the market, with the remainder taken up by hybrids or vehicles that use hydrogen technology.

  • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Take it easy, it’s a bit more complex than that. Slow as it might be, everyone understands you can charge an EV even with just a regular 15A 120V plug. Stuck at your father in laws out in the country? They’ve still got a plug.

    Generally, people are uncomfortable with high pressure explosive gases. I think overall, hydrogen gas a better shot in industrial/heavy trucking markets than consumer transport.

    • Hypx@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      No it isn’t. In fact, the opposite is true. It’s much harder to wire up millions of charging stations with the necessary amount of power, than to deal with high pressure gas. We’ve just normalized the danger of high-voltage electricity. In reality, this is just as safe if not more so, and a lot easier to pull off.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You can plug an EV into an outlet in your garage. No way could hydrogen be easier than that.

        • Hypx@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          You have to have a garage to begin with. People have created a distorted grasp of what infrastructure even is.

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Two thirds of Americans have a garage. Roughly zero can refuel hydrogen cells at home.

            • Hypx@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              2/3 is still not 100%. And you can refuel at home if you really wanted. In fact, you can even refuel a gasoline car at home. But in reality this was never a major selling point. It’s just the crutch BEV fans are relying on. The refueling infrastructure is the only thing that really matters.

              • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Most EV users charge at home, this is absolutely a major selling point, and they would all lose this ability if they switched to hydrogen. Which is why they aren’t switching to hydrogen.

                • Hypx@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  And a lot of people can’t charge at home. You will still need public stations.

                  In the end, this is just the whining of a handful of rich people. If it is more straightforward to get everyone to refuel at public stations, it is the better solution.

                  • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    You will need public stations with hydrogen, too. But with BEV, you need a lot fewer stations. Which is why switching to BEVs is a lot more straightforward.

      • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Erm, no buddy. Everyone’s entitled to their incorrect opinion, and this one’s a doozy.

        How much big of a tank of H2 do you need to effectively equal the energy capacity of a lithium ion pack? If the tank needs to be reasonably sized, how high is the pressure? How do you ensure hydrogen embrittlement isn’t a problem on both the tanks and the transport pipes/storage tanks? How does pressure correlate with exfiltration?

        Flying wires is a walk in the park, especially competitively.

        • Hypx@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          A 700 bar tank will store more than energy than a similarly sized li-ion battery.

          As an energy storage system for cars, the problem is already solved. People are just repeating the same anti-progress rhetoric that was used against battery cars.

            • Hypx@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              We’ve been doing it for over a decade now. It is shown to be safe.

              • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                No thanks. I’d much prefer electrified mass transit. I’m saying this as a former manufacturing engineer, there’s quite a bit that can go wrong with cyclically pressurized vessels in subtle ways that are difficult to non-destructively evaluate.

                This is not the path forward for anyone but heavy industry.