Polls show Americans between the ages of 18 and 29 are more likely to agree that Israel is committing genocide in besieged Gaza than other age groups in the country.
Can a PDF have a virus? Yes, PDFs can contain harmful security threats such as viruses, malware, and trojans. Like many other file types, PDFs can be used to compromise our data and sensitive information if you do not take the proper precautions.
It attempted to download to my phone when clicking, and I have configured it to not automatically open PDFs for this reason. This terminology is correct.
Edit: this is so tremendously stupid, op is defending the poll while I’m discussing the source. Anyone down voting, feel free to explain to me why we should be giving any attention to Erdogan’s state-run media instead of the guardian.
Overall, we rate Brooking Institution Left-Center biased based on donations to primarily Democratic candidates and policy advocacy that slightly favors the left. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to strong sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Edit: op thinks I’m refuting the poll and not the source. Stay calibrated, boss.
I presented a reliable source and you refuse to look at it. Do you have problems with the guardian as well?
Among younger Americans, and along political lines, divisions are more prominent. Almost half of those surveyed aged 18-29, 49%, say Israel is committing genocide, with 24% disagreeing and 27% uncertain.
I’ll click a guardian link, thanks. Is there a reason you chose to post a much worse source for this information? I, along with others here, refuted your source. Why not post the guardian article in the beginning?
I don’t see why presenting another worse source reinforces anything. I might come away with the impression that if a worse source is also saying the same thing that the information might be suspect.
Sorry I don’t download random shit.
Don’t have to download it. It will open a link. If you don’t wanna look at the evidence this conversation is over. Thanks for coming out
Umm, clicking the link makes it download. WTF are you smoking?
I’m using a browser with a built-in PDF reader. I’m sorry I assumed you would do the same.
What do you think happens when you open a PDF in your browser? 😆
The same thing that happens when you view an image in your browser. It’s all downloaded my dude.
https://www.ilovepdf.com/blog/can-a-pdf-have-a-virus#:~:text=Yes%2C PDFs can contain harmful,not take the proper precautions.
I don’t disagree. Doesn’t change the fact that you were using the wrong terminology.
It attempted to download to my phone when clicking, and I have configured it to not automatically open PDFs for this reason. This terminology is correct.
I think it alerts me to people that I should block for wasting my time.
Sounds good. Thankfully, most people here aren’t as gullible as you.
Already posted evidence, bad source is bad.
Edit: this is so tremendously stupid, op is defending the poll while I’m discussing the source. Anyone down voting, feel free to explain to me why we should be giving any attention to Erdogan’s state-run media instead of the guardian.
Right and then refused to look at further evidence.
You should be able to find this information presented by a reliable source, like I did.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/brookings-institute/
Edit: op thinks I’m refuting the poll and not the source. Stay calibrated, boss.
I presented a reliable source and you refuse to look at it. Do you have problems with the guardian as well?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/24/americans-believe-israel-committing-genocide-poll
I’ll click a guardian link, thanks. Is there a reason you chose to post a much worse source for this information? I, along with others here, refuted your source. Why not post the guardian article in the beginning?
Posted the Guardian link previously. This just reinforced the Guardian story.
Free to block me if you don’t like the way I post. My feelings won’t be hurt.
I don’t see why presenting another worse source reinforces anything. I might come away with the impression that if a worse source is also saying the same thing that the information might be suspect.
I would think the guardian article would suffice.