• Zarxrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m always skeptical of the idea that people can’t handle more than one news story at a time.

    So NBC wants to point out that there wasn’t much coverage of this issue? Maybe NBC should take some responsibility for not pushing the story harder in the first place?

    • MercuryUprising@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also worth noting that there’s no further story to the migrant ship. It sunk and people died. There is no ongoing search.

      • Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is the real answer. Also a tiny sub sinking to the bottom of the ocean possibly with people/civilians still living in it is a lot more unique and captivating situation.

        The news covered it and the resources went where all the eyes were. They coast guard and all these people likely had a pretty good idea that they were already dead but they can’t just give up and walk away while the entire world is watching. Instead they have to show what all those tax dollars are for. If 5 migrants ended up sinking to the bottom of the ocean in a submarine in the same situation I think it still would have had the same response.

        • ANGRY_MAPLE@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was drawn in the science and horror of it, because I have a weird fascination with learning about the disasters that lead to new safety regulations. I like learning the “what”, the “how” and the “why” of how these things happen.

          I like learning about the specific mechanics that lead to failure, as they can often somewhat translate to real life. These random things help me keep my team safer.

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sadly its not “new” and is a story we’ve all heard every season for most of our lives. The story isn’t viral because the tragedy. Its viral because how unique the tragedy is.

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah it seems pretty ridiculous for a new network that’s been pushing coverage of the Titan to complain about this. Why not just cover the other story, then?

    • leosa@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right? I watched one youtube video about this sub, and now I’m getting flooded by recommendations about the same story. Most of them are NBC clips.

    • reubendevries@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As long as the Capitalist market controls the vast majority of the news then this will ALWAYS be the case. Capitalism is by default self serving. So it’s in their best interest to get the world concerned about some billionaires stuck in a tin can submarine somewhere in the ocean, over hundreds of refugees drowning.

    • e-ratic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reminds me, there was an article on the hill which blamed messaging from the scientific community to rising sea levels:

      https://web.archive.org/web/20230621075834/https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/4057045-catch-22-scientific-communication-failures-linked-to-faster-rising-seas/

      Maybe if the media and journalists didn’t waste the last 30 years engaging in “is climate change real” and both-sideism. But apparently it’s the entire scientific community’s fault that they didn’t word it any better. Definitely not the publications’ fault.