Someone did a whole deep dive on this on tiktok, they did have a carnicopia, but they sold their company and restructured to get out of paying for the cleaning of a massive environmental disaster they caused, and that company, also called fruit of the loom is technically a different company and has never had the carnicopia. They don’t claim it, even though they 100% did use it.
Which has sparked the trend online to say that the Mandela effect is for the most part just corporate gaslighting
One, fruit of the loom bought that company after this event happened (were not owners during the event), they became liable by buying them.
Two, that has nothing to do with a coronocupia being in the logo, there is no good evidence of a cornucopia ever being in the logo, that was just a tik toker driving up views by trying to link it to the more popular mandela effect thing. Removing a small section of a logo to cover up a chemical spill? That makes absolutely zero sense (not to mention it’s not exactly covered up, it’s on the epa website). But good on them for spreading awareness of chemical contamination by companies. Bad on them for doing it by making up nonsense about the logo to drum up views.
Someone did a whole deep dive on this on tiktok, they did have a carnicopia, but they sold their company and restructured to get out of paying for the cleaning of a massive environmental disaster they caused, and that company, also called fruit of the loom is technically a different company and has never had the carnicopia. They don’t claim it, even though they 100% did use it.
Which has sparked the trend online to say that the Mandela effect is for the most part just corporate gaslighting
One, fruit of the loom bought that company after this event happened (were not owners during the event), they became liable by buying them. Two, that has nothing to do with a coronocupia being in the logo, there is no good evidence of a cornucopia ever being in the logo, that was just a tik toker driving up views by trying to link it to the more popular mandela effect thing. Removing a small section of a logo to cover up a chemical spill? That makes absolutely zero sense (not to mention it’s not exactly covered up, it’s on the epa website). But good on them for spreading awareness of chemical contamination by companies. Bad on them for doing it by making up nonsense about the logo to drum up views.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/fruit-of-the-loom-cornucopia/
And yet, it’s an EPA superfund
https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/case-summary-aislic-settlement-agreement-fruit-loom-environmental-insurance-claims
TLDR: They bought seven contaminated properties. went bankrupt. $42 mill cleanup bill.
Yes that’s all true, I agree with you. And I hate how big companies pass on the cost of their waste to the public in this and so many other instances.
The linking it to a supposed coronocupia logo was the clickbait nonsense to drum up views though.
What environmental disaster did am underwear company create? Was it bleech and dye related?
https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2024/01/03/misleading-fruit-of-the-loom-tiktok-pbb-contamination/72098017007/
deleted by creator
Kek this false seeming conspiracy has spread far. TikTok is great for that