• EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    256
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Doesn’t even question what employees are possibly doing. Just says there are too many and they must be put out on the street. Says the people who are left are making too much money.

    I say this a lot but…seriously…when do we start burning things?

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      122
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Hedge fund. He doesn’t care about the employees or the company. Just the money he can make trading the stock.

      • Kalkaline @lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        I want to make money off of Google stock too, but I also want their shit to work so I can make more money in the future.

        • AnonTwo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          10 months ago

          I mean if he catches wind their products stop working to the point consumers react, he can just sell his stock and move on to destroy another company.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I own a little Google stock. I don’t mind they pay their employees a shit ton. I want them make good products. I’m not a fan of most their products but that’s just me

          • Pepsi@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            lol sorry to break it to you but a few bucks in fractional shares doesn’t count as “owning a little stock”

            🤣

            • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              I own about 250k of Google stock. So a little bit. I don’t own more because I don’t like that you are the product.

      • Ænima@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        So what you’re saying is we start the burning with him?

    • lobotomo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m genuinely not super revolutionary but I didn’t get halfway through this letter before coming to the realization that this person needed to not exist anymore and same for anybody else of the same ilk.

    • paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      He says they aren’t needed “operationally” but Alphabet is not supposed to be merely operating anything. They are supposed to be inventing and experimenting and pushing the envelope. This discontented billionaire just wants ever-increasing rent on existing IP and should be called out as a simple landlord and not called an investor at all.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      The source matters, too. This is a dude exploiting people and hoarding so much needed wealth. To an obscene amount. Like, he has more than enough to do everything he could possibly dream of, for the rest of his life. And long after he’s gone, all his descendants will be set and will never have to worry about money for their entire lives…

      So what does this psychopath obsess about? “Please kick people out into the street and reduce the pay of anyone who remains. Number go up… Fuck em, got mine lol”

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, I’m not sure I really get this whole “reduce employment” logic. Like if some product just isn’t profitable and you lay off the employees you hired to work on it, that’s not surprising, but if the employees are doing something profitable, and you actually needed to hire that many to get whatever it was you hired them for done, shouldn’t it be more profitable to a company to keep them, even if one had a large number?

      • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Most of them are not. That’s the beauty of a cash cow like Google. They’re working on things that may be profitable in the future. By cutting the future, you’re cutting future growth.
        It’s why I dislike hedge funds. They’re stripping value instead of creating value.

    • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because he doesn’t care. He’s looking out for himself.

      “Hey Googs, you have too many employees and that’s cutting in my investments. Shitcan 150,000 so my investments go up and I make more billions kthxbye”

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The funny thing is… what are the operational requirements of an R&D organization?

      As far as I can see, it’s nothing, by definition.

      Anyway, does the rich person there not understand that? Also, what is the value of an R&D organization where people are demotivated?

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        The rich person only cares about short term profits. They want to liquidate any good will and long term preparedness. Once the host corporation has been sufficiently bled of value, the parasite will move on to the next source of value it can find.

          • enkers@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Correct. R&D only creates future value. Usually in the VC model, R&D is done by individuals or small groups and then funded (bought) by VC to get it to market. So even though the R&D do-er can cash out their future profits for immediate profits, the value of that R&D can’t be realized immediately.

            I personally think the VC and legacy models are currently competing, and VC is winning out. As we see here, even large, established companies aren’t immune to impinging VCs.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      My hatred of the owner class is matched only by my disappointment in my fellow humans for not only taking it, but often defending it.

      The people we struggle for have abandoned their humanity. That’s what it takes to be one of society’s supposed winners or be in their good graces: practiced sociopathy.

      And half of the peasants fantasize about being the sociopaths instead of ending their reign and this despicable con game of an economy.