• ammonium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    Saved from a Russian invasion. It’s a bit exaggerated, but not entirely untrue I believe.

    • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Europe has contributed more money than USA, so they can share a little less than half the credit.

      It’s basically the same deal as WW2 - sure, the USA has had a big impact - but Europe’s not exactly shirked its share of the heavy lifting.

        • shneancy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          a continent united through trade, (mostly) shared currency, open borders, and a union that governs over member countries each having their own laws.

          Now compare it to the US, united through trade, open borders, shared currency, and a federal government that governs member states that each have their own laws.

          obviously there are major diffences between the two but for the sake of comparison in the “who put more effort into something” debate comparing US and Europe on the grounds of “single country vs many countries” is rather silly

          • Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Well the other person said you can compare based on surface area (wtf?) and population. Googling population of Europe gives me a number that’s twice the size of the USA. So per capita, assuming they’ve both given the same effort, the USA has given twice as much as Europe.

            Come up with a metric that’s not silly then.