King@lemy.lol to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 10 months agoDitch themlemy.lolimagemessage-square132fedilinkarrow-up11.1Karrow-down138file-text
arrow-up11.06Karrow-down1imageDitch themlemy.lolKing@lemy.lol to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 10 months agomessage-square132fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareAgentGrimstone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down2·10 months agoI’m talking about very large ones where it’s basically just a big mind dump. A lot of people talking but not really to each other.
minus-squareshneancy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoyeah same, if at the bare minimum the chat doesn’t come to a natural stop every couple of hours then I’m not going to talk in there
minus-squaresoggy_kittylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·edit-210 months agoDefine very large, we could be agreeing but I have no idea where your cut-off is
minus-squareAgentGrimstone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoHundreds+. I would consider 50, like your Slack group, to be small.
minus-squaresoggy_kittylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoYou think 50 people in one instant messaging chat room is small? I would consider small to be <10. Our scales are way off
I’m talking about very large ones where it’s basically just a big mind dump. A lot of people talking but not really to each other.
yeah same, if at the bare minimum the chat doesn’t come to a natural stop every couple of hours then I’m not going to talk in there
Define very large, we could be agreeing but I have no idea where your cut-off is
Hundreds+. I would consider 50, like your Slack group, to be small.
You think 50 people in one instant messaging chat room is small? I would consider small to be <10.
Our scales are way off