• @Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    935 months ago

    because it “depends on Nintendo’s proprietary libraries.”

    At first I was a bit disappointed in Valve, but this really clarified some things. Valve is legit scared of litigation with Nintendo, which is 100% a thing I would expect any company to be scared of.

    • @Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      175 months ago

      I wouldn’t say it’s legit scared.

      More like, why? Why fight on behalf of some random person who doesn’t have a history with Valve?

      Why would anybody risk an extremely long drawn out and expensive lawsuit because of a nobody who has a really cool demo?

    • firecat
      link
      fedilink
      -235 months ago

      They did this with TF2 dev, no it’s not Nintendo anymore it’s Valve.

      • @Darorad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        285 months ago

        I mean, it’s one thing to fan remake a single player game from a decade ago in a very different way, and a very different thing to remake a live Multi-player game made in basically the same engine.

      • @cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        235 months ago

        One of them (the Portal demake) used Nintendo’s proprietary code/libraries without permission, prompting a request to take it down, the TF thing ripped off Valve’s assets without permission and redistributed them, which got a DMCA. If you see this and think “Valve is out taking down everything they can like Nintendo” you really missed something.

        • firecat
          link
          fedilink
          -115 months ago

          Just stop with the stupid nonsense Valve is in good side, no they aren’t. People’s opinion of Valve was wrong and defended them won’t change that.

          • @kattenluik@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            105 months ago

            For the record: the commenter I am replying to has shown over and over to be very rude and every comment for as far as I can see scrolling down for quite a while is something negative about Valve even when it’s simple facts like what they replied to this time.

            I wouldn’t dare say take anything they say super seriously, and we of course do all know that Valve is still just a company.

            • firecat
              link
              fedilink
              -25 months ago

              Valve negatives are always being shaped into nothingness or acting like it’s normal. A stolen patient is not normal corporate behavior.

              • @kattenluik@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                35 months ago

                They’re explained and what gets marked as normal means normal for what their goal towards the general public seems to be, you just look like an insane person with what your profile looks like.

                • firecat
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -25 months ago

                  You are the problem if you think a billion dollar corporation should steal game controllers, should not offer refunds, should locked games into locations and other criminal activity that can put you in jail.

  • Chozo
    link
    fedilink
    405 months ago

    Another reminder of the age-old lesson: If you’re working on a fan project that involves another company/person’s IP, keep it a secret until you’re ready to release it. So many cool fan projects get shut down because they get impatient and show off their work so early that they get C&D’d before they ever get a chance to come close to finishing their project.

    • @Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      175 months ago

      Don’t forget the other age-old lesson:

      Be prepared to pivot. There’s nothing stopping you from making a homage/inspired by with your own intellectual property.

  • @SatyrSack@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It may not be gone for good

    Naturally, there is disappointment in the comments on Lambert’s Patreon post, and some users suggested Lambert might be able to move ahead with the project if he switched from Libultra, the official Nintendo 64 SDK, to libdragon, an open source SDK. Lambert said he’s not sure if doing so would appease Valve, and he’s reluctant to dive into it without first getting a green light from Valve.

    “I would consider porting to libdragon if Valve agreed to allowing me to finish before trying to make the jump,” he wrote. “It would be a lot of work and I wouldn’t want to commit to it before knowing if it would actually pay off.” He doesn’t seem to think that’s very likely to happen, though: “They also don’t seem too interested in the project as I can’t meaningfully distribute it on Steam.”

  • Transporter Room 3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -115 months ago

    So a company is getting worked up because someone who isnt working for them is using tools from another company that sues over not bowing hard enough to make a fan-made version of the first company’s game in second company’s system.

    In other words “greedy capitalists capitalist all over the place, cool fan game caught in crossfire”

    Inb4 fanboys trip over themselves to tell me I’m wrong.