Star to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago"Did you realize that we live in a reality where SciHub is illegal, and OpenAI is not?"fosstodon.orgexternal-linkmessage-square215fedilinkarrow-up11.29Karrow-down145
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1external-link"Did you realize that we live in a reality where SciHub is illegal, and OpenAI is not?"fosstodon.orgStar to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square215fedilink
minus-squareJoeKrogan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 year agoThats actually not a bad idea, train a model with all the data in scihub a then release the model to the public
minus-squareLiz@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoIt would still be useless, the thing would just produce bullshit papers.
minus-squareworldsayshi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoActually a good point.
minus-squareChocrates@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThat would likely be explicitly illegal if the NYT case succeeds (and it isn’t fraud as OpenAI alleges)
minus-squareඞmir@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoThis is just the most inefficient zip file ever created
Thats actually not a bad idea, train a model with all the data in scihub a then release the model to the public
It would still be useless, the thing would just produce bullshit papers.
Actually a good point.
That would likely be explicitly illegal if the NYT case succeeds (and it isn’t fraud as OpenAI alleges)
This is just the most inefficient zip file ever created