• voxel
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      systemd-boot is a reasonable compromise. i like it

      • pryre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The reality is that a bootloader will seemingly always be needed to account for difficult BIOS’ and legacy setups (I’m looking at you, dual-booted Ubuntu 20.04).

    • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Naah I just disable secure boot altogether, then you don’t have to worry about all that TPM security theatre.

        • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, but Windows 11 needs it.

          Can be disabled though. Easiest way - use Rufus when burning the USB.

          Fun fact, you can also install Win11 in MBR mode, no UEFI needed whatsoever.