With the new Reddit policies, when a sub protests and goes private, could re-edit just step in, oust a moderator and switch it back to public?

    • Otome-chan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s under rule 4 “be active and engaged”:

      Camping or sitting on a community is not encouraged. If a community has been empty or unmoderated for a significant amount of time, we will consider banning or restricting the community. If a user requests a takeover of a community that falls under either category, we will consider granting that request but will, in nearly all cases, attempt to reach out to the moderator team first to discuss their intentions for the community.

      source.

      • LachlanUnchained@lemmyunchained.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        A private community is not camped. It is active behind doors.

        Is there any communication from Reddit actually saying that’s the basis of taking over subs? Or is it just speculation?

        • Otome-chan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A private community is not camped. It is active behind doors.

          Correct, but the protesting subs were not active privately, that’s the point. they were shut down. there wasn’t activity going on in private.

          Is there any communication from Reddit actually saying that’s the basis of taking over subs? Or is it just speculation?

          Yes this is what they said in the modmail.