• FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because “union density” is shorter. Just as “GDP” is shorter than “sum of the income of everyone in a country”.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s jargon, like “OOP” and “VRAM”. The people who tend to refer to it will understand.

    • Ranvier
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I get the term after reading the article, I’ve just never heard it described that way before. Their own figures say union membership rates in the article which seems much clearer to me and has the same number of words as “union density rate.” Density seems to imply something more geographic or spatial, just seems like an odd way to describe it.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s an econ term, it doesn’t have to make sense to non-economists!

        For instance you would think the unemployment rate is the percentage of the population without employment, but no.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just as “GDP” is shorter than “sum of the income of everyone in a country” “who’s winning at capitalism”.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Winning is a matter of perspective. There are plenty of people of who would not want to move to a country with higher GDP.