nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 11 months agoStarfield is now mostly negative in recent reviewsstore.steampowered.comexternal-linkmessage-square260fedilinkarrow-up1582arrow-down134cross-posted to: gamedeals@lemmy.zipgamedeals@lemmy.zipstarfield@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1548arrow-down1external-linkStarfield is now mostly negative in recent reviewsstore.steampowered.comnanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square260fedilinkcross-posted to: gamedeals@lemmy.zipgamedeals@lemmy.zipstarfield@lemmy.zip
minus-squareAlexWIWA@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up110arrow-down3·11 months agoSomehow it got nominated for the “most innovative gameplay” in the Steam awards. Absolute joke
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up70arrow-down4·11 months agoIDK, it’s been awhile since someone had the audacity to make something so repetitive and pass it off as AAA gameplay.
minus-squareAlexWIWA@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up40·11 months agoIt required true innovation to make a game this aggressively mediocre and bland. True
minus-squareGentlemanLoser@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·11 months agoYeah, the last time was FO4
minus-squareVilian@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoyou need to be able to open the game to see the bland gameplay
minus-squarePanPuszek@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30arrow-down2·11 months agoIt’s completely beyond me. Bethesda fanboys had to be on some hard as shit copium to nominate it.
minus-squarePraiseTheSoup@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 months agoI can’t really think of any part of it that is innovative. Just basic game systems that have all been done before slapped together.
minus-squareHonytawk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down9·11 months agoYou can hate on it all you want, even say the game was boring and bland. But the way they did New Game + was very innovative.
minus-squaremerthyr1831@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·11 months agoYou have to complete the game to even play the New Game +, dont think that’s what got them the nomination
minus-squareGentlemanLoser@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·11 months agoThat’s like a film winning an award based on the director’s cut
minus-squaremerthyr1831@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·11 months agoA directors cut you cant even watch until you watch the regular cut that no one cares for
minus-squareWilliam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 months agoI thought that was a good idea, and I’m a huge fan of timeloops… But so much of the rest was poorly done that after a couple loops, you stop wanting to loop.
minus-squareAlexWIWA@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoTrue that idea was definitely cool
Somehow it got nominated for the “most innovative gameplay” in the Steam awards. Absolute joke
IDK, it’s been awhile since someone had the audacity to make something so repetitive and pass it off as AAA gameplay.
It required true innovation to make a game this aggressively mediocre and bland. True
Yeah, the last time was FO4
FO76 is calling…
you need to be able to open the game to see the bland gameplay
It’s completely beyond me. Bethesda fanboys had to be on some hard as shit copium to nominate it.
I can’t really think of any part of it that is innovative. Just basic game systems that have all been done before slapped together.
You can hate on it all you want, even say the game was boring and bland.
But the way they did New Game + was very innovative.
You have to complete the game to even play the New Game +, dont think that’s what got them the nomination
That’s like a film winning an award based on the director’s cut
A directors cut you cant even watch until you watch the regular cut that no one cares for
I thought that was a good idea, and I’m a huge fan of timeloops… But so much of the rest was poorly done that after a couple loops, you stop wanting to loop.
True that idea was definitely cool