jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 1 年前A Demographic Time Bomb Is About to Hit the Beef Industrywww.wired.comexternal-linkmessage-square72fedilinkarrow-up1155arrow-down15cross-posted to: cooking@mander.xyz
arrow-up1150arrow-down1external-linkA Demographic Time Bomb Is About to Hit the Beef Industrywww.wired.comjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square72fedilinkcross-posted to: cooking@mander.xyz
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前 all sentient beings are morally relevant under what ethical system?
minus-squareiiGxC@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentiocentrism https://sentientism.info/
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前that’s not my ethical system. most people don’t subscribe to it.
minus-squareiiGxC@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前Right, most people subscribe to their holy book(s) of choice
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前even among professional philosophers the prevailing ethical system is deontology
minus-squarespud@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 年前according to some, but kant never went in for it. the strongest attempt to marry them seems to be from korsgaard, but howe treated her argument pretty roughly in “why kant animals have rights” (2019)
under what ethical system?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentiocentrism
https://sentientism.info/
that’s not my ethical system. most people don’t subscribe to it.
Right, most people subscribe to their holy book(s) of choice
even among professional philosophers the prevailing ethical system is deontology
sentientism is compatible with deontology
according to some, but kant never went in for it. the strongest attempt to marry them seems to be from korsgaard, but howe treated her argument pretty roughly in “why kant animals have rights” (2019)