• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    147
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    That, by itself, should be cause to remove the Texas Lt. Gov from office. He’s literally committing sedition and violating his oath of office.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m sure Texas will get right on that, just as soon as they’ve removed accused felon Ken Paxton from office.

      • Rhinopotamus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I recognize this is not the point of the post, but an accused felon doesn’t really make sense, since a felon is someone who is formally tried and convicted of a felonious crime.

        • MisterFeeny@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Not sure if you’re just arguing semantics here, but just for clarification in case you, or anyone else, is unsure why the other person might have said “accused felon”, it is because Paxton was indicted for felony securities fraud back in 2015. He has used his political office to delay the trial since then, and has yet to be tried. 8 years and counting since the indictment without a trial. Hence, “accused felon”.

          • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Probably worth noting: His wife is a lawmaker, and he was impeached. But impeachment is only the first step in removing someone from office, just like indictment is the first step in a criminal trial. He was impeached by the House of Representatives, but it failed to pass in the senate because they voted along party lines. His wife refused to recuse herself from the vote.