• Happybara@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Tolerance is just an extension of the social contract. Intolerant people are actively violating the social contract and, as such, are not eligible for the benefits such a contract provides. This has been settled law for millennia. Live and let live… or else.

    • bigFab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The problem is ppl disagree on what represents tolerance. i.e: letting a trans compete in sport can be tolerance of gender diversity, while at the same time intolerance of competition rules.

      Sometimes one cannot know what is someone fighting intolerance gonna end up doing. Germans had been too tolerant of jewish wealthy elite until nazis had enough of it. Hitler was democratically elected and crimes begun only after that.

        • bigFab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I didn’t know this specifics, but after reading that I’m still waiting further explanation. Each party had own guerilla and wikipedia didn’t mention especially bloody SA behaviour.

          2000 SA vs 130 police = deads 15 vs 4 is a pretty normal protest clash outcome. I believe they killed also some more jews, but from that to a concentration camp there is a difference.

      • voidMainVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        letting a trans compete in sport can be tolerance of gender diversity, while at the same time intolerance of competition rules.

        Oh no! Won’t somebody think of the rules?!

        Rules don’t have rights. People do. When the rules don’t respect people’s rights, then the rules have to change.